While the sniping against the Vision for Space Exploration continues
from the planetary science community (yes, I'm refusing to call it by
that other name), NASA has wisely turned to an ad agency to help
better sell it. A good move, IMHO, as NASA PAO has never shown very
much skill in public relations.
I wonder what sort of ideas that Don Draper, from my favorite show
about Madison Avenue, would have?
posted by Mark at 8:06 PM
Apparently John McCain, who wants very much to be the Republican
nominee for President, once toyed with the idea of leaving the
Republican Party. Perhaps someone should ask McCain about this and
perhaps extract a pledge that he not contemplate it again, especially
if elected President.
posted by Mark at 1:13 PM
Another image from the new Indiana Jones film. Cate Blanchett looks
very annoyed with the Man with the Whip. And what are those guys in
1950s American Army uniforms doing there?
posted by Mark at 1:07 PM
Captain Ed has some thoughts about the recent terror bombing, where Al
Qaeda used two women with Downs Syndrome as conveyers of the bombs.
The people who would used mentally challanged women in this way are
not human beings, in my considerate opinion, and have placed
themselves beyond human civilization and its rules.
posted by Mark at 12:48 PM
Rand Simberg has a piece taking note of the various anniversaries,
good and bad, that seem to have happened this time of year. A couple
of howlers in his piece needs to be corrected:
Moreover, because of NASA's refusal to use existing commercial
launch vehicles such as the Boeing Delta and Lockheed Martin Atlas,
which would have spread the fixed costs of maintaining those
systems over a larger number of flights, the costs to the
Department of Defense for satellite launches will go up. This seems
to be not just ignoring, but perverting the requirement to support
national security with the new program.
Rand is referring to the Delta IV and Atlas V respectively,
colledtively known as the EELV. NASA has determined for various
reasons having to do with lift and safety, that neither of these
vehicles have sufficent capability to launch an Orion space craft to
Low Earth orbit. Furthermore, Rand seems to have forgotten that the
original rationale for these two two launch vehicles was to launch
both military and commercial payloads. The predicted commercial market
has not entirely panned out for the EELV, hence the higher than
expected launch costs. Hardly NASA's fault. NASA has, however,
commited to using EELVs for various scientific and other payloads,
including the deployment of a lunar GPS system.
Rand goes on with:
Beyond that, there are reportedly serious technical issues with
NASA's chosen approach, from an overweight crew module, to an
underperforming launch system that may shake itself and the crew
module apart.
What Rand neglects to add is that these sorts of issues crop up in
just about every development project, particularly of launch vehicles.
The Saturn V had vibration probems. The original lunar module had
weight problems. Both of them were fixed, as one would presume that
problems that seem to worry Rand about the Ares launch system and the
Orion space craft will be fixed.
Even in the commercial area, technical problems crop up. SpaceX's
Falcon 1 have had two launch failures, for example. SpaceX's engineers
have ascertained the causes of these failures and are fixing them. It
is noted that no one who is having Internet vapors over the Ares is
having the same over the Falcon. There seems to be, perhaps because of
a double standard, more of an understanding that problems will occur
in rocket development in the private sector than at NASA.
posted by Mark at 11:50 AM
Berkley wants to give the US Marines the royal order of the boot, and
Senator Demint is is not pleased.
DeMint said he will draft legislation to rescind any earmarks
dedicated for the City of Berkeley in the recently passed
appropriations bill -- which his office tallied to value about $2.1
million. He said that any money taken back would be transferred to
the Marines.
DeMint's office provided a preliminary list of items that would be
subject to his proposal:
-- $975,000 for the University of California at Berkeley, for the
Matsui Center for Politics and Public Service, which may include
establishing an endowment, and for cataloguing the papers of
Congressman Robert Matsui.
-- $750,000 for the Berkeley/Albana ferry service.
-- $243,000 for the Chez Panisse Foundation, for a school lunch
initiative to integrate lessons about wellness, sustainability and
nutrition into the academic curriculum.
-- $94,000 for a Berkeley public safety interoperability program.
Of course cancelling the earmarks is good policy regardless.
posted by Mark at 10:33 AM
This is the sort of bone headed bureaucratic move that makes one
despair. NASA has had this tendency to make even the most exciting
things it does seem--well--boring. Changing the Vision for Space
Exploration, which one admits has a certain poetry, to United States
Space Exploration Policy, which has that colorless, gray feel to it
could only have come from someone who never read poetry, or saw an
epic movie, or read science fiction.
posted by Mark at 9:18 AM
Five years ago the skies over Texas were illuminated with the flying
funeral pyre that was the Columbia. Here is what I had to say at the
time.
The funeral pyre of the crew of Columbia STS-107 streaked across
the Texas sky like some horrible comet. In ancient times comets
were considered to be a prelude to Earth-shaking events, the rise
and fall of empires, or the birth and death of kings. What turns of
history this tragedy will set in motion no one can predict. One can
offer, though, some suggestions of what should be.
Read it all.
No comments:
Post a Comment